The Dual Sovereignty: A Nuanced History of the Vatican, the Papacy, and its Geopolitical Role (1st Century to Present Day)
I. The Apostolic Foundation and the Primacy of Rome (1st–8th Centuries)
A. The Petrine Succession and Apostolic Legitimacy
The office of the Pope serves simultaneously as the Bishop of Rome and the recognized head of the worldwide Catholic Church. The immense spiritual and political authority wielded by the Papacy stems fundamentally from the doctrine of apostolic succession, tracing its lineage directly back to Saint Peter. Catholics understand this primacy to be derived from the specific conferral of authority by Jesus Christ upon Peter, naming him the "rock" upon which the Church would be constructed. Peter received the symbolic "Keys of Heaven" and the significant powers of "binding and loosing," establishing him as the first holder of the office.
The structure of the Papacy is thus based on successfully transforming a singular, foundational religious mandate (Christ’s commission to Peter) into a perpetually recurring political and ecclesiastical office embodied by the Bishop of Rome. The jurisdiction of this episcopal see is termed the Holy See, a title derived from the Latin word sede, meaning 'seat' or 'chair'. The sustained longevity and global influence of the institution rely entirely on its capacity to translate this transcendent, divine authority into a specific, identifiable terrestrial office, permanently anchored in the city of Rome.
B. The Physical Location: Vatican Hill, Necropolis, and St. Peter's Tomb
The precise location of the modern Vatican City State is intrinsically linked to the earliest traditions concerning the death and burial of Saint Peter. Church tradition has consistently maintained that Peter was buried in a pagan cemetery situated on Vatican Hill around A.D. 66. Archaeological investigations conducted beneath the foundations of the current St. Peter's Basilica, specifically involving the Vatican Necropolis, have yielded evidence supporting this historical claim.
The excavation of the Necropolis revealed a complex of pagan mausolea dating from the 2nd and 3rd centuries. Crucially, archaeologists found that while no mausoleum was built directly beneath the present high altar, shallow burials existed there, with later burials clustering respectfully around this central space. There was also a small niched monument built into a wall around 160 AD. Testing of human remains found in a niche in the graffiti wall revealed bones belonging to a man aged 60 to 70 years old, which Margherita Guarducci argued were the remains of Saint Peter, relocated from the original grave site under the aedicula during the reign of Constantine after the peace of the church in 313. The placement of the Basilica and the central altar over the site of Peter’s supposed burial effectively formalized the Church’s eventual absorption and transformation of this ancient Roman, originally pagan, religious and political space. This sacred geography—defined by the apostolic presence—preceded and continues to legitimize the later political establishment of the sovereign territory.
C. Early Assertions of Primacy and the Dualistic Theory
As the Roman Empire declined in the West, the Bishops of Rome increasingly asserted their institutional authority. Pope Gelasius I (492–496) played a crucial role in elevating the status of the Papacy. He was the first pope to be referred to formally as the “vicar of Christ,” a title that significantly reinforced the notion of papal supremacy over all other bishops.
Gelasius I also articulated a dualistic political theory that profoundly shaped medieval ecclesiology and political thought: the “theory of the two swords”. This theory insisted upon a division of authority, asserting that the pope embodied spiritual power (auctoritas), while the emperor embodied temporal power (potestas). This doctrine, later supported by Pope Pelagius I (556–561), was instrumental in defining the institutional boundaries of the Church. By advocating for this division, the Gelasian theory inherently prioritized the spiritual domain, establishing the moral and legal precedent that the spiritual authority of the Papacy was fundamentally superior to secular rule, even though the secular ruler governed the physical realm. This theoretical assertion provided the intellectual justification necessary for the later development of papal territorial claims and the acquisition of temporal dominion.
II. The Age of Temporal Sovereignty: The Papal States (756–1870)
A. The Genesis of Temporal Power and the Donation of Pippin
The transition of the Papacy from a purely spiritual authority to a temporal ruler was driven by geopolitical necessity in the 8th century. When the Lombard forces threatened to overrun the entire Italian peninsula in the 750s, Pope Stephen II (752–757) appealed for military assistance to the Frankish ruler, Pippin III (the Short).
Pippin intervened and, in 756, “restored” the lands of central Italy to the Roman See, disregarding the competing sovereignty claims of the Byzantine Empire. This "Donation of Pippin" provided the explicit basis for the Papacy’s claim to temporal power. Concurrently, the Lombard king Aistulf ceded territory in northern and central Italy by the Treaty of Pavia. The territories thus placed under direct papal governance—including present-day Lazio, Marche, Umbria, and part of Emilia-Romagna—became known as the Papal States, the Church States, or the Republic of Saint Peter, a political entity that lasted until 1870. The establishment of temporal sovereignty was not a planned theological outcome but a required military-political measure accepted by the Papacy to ensure its physical protection and autonomy from surrounding powers.
B. The Legal Fiction: The Donation of Constantine
To lend historical and divine weight to its newfound temporal authority, the Papacy relied upon one of the most significant forgeries of the Middle Ages: the Donation of Constantine. Composed by an unknown writer in the 8th century, this document falsely purported to be a record of the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great bestowing vast territory and temporal power upon Pope Sylvester I (reigned 314–335) and his successors.
The document's clear intent was to furnish the papacy with a divine and historical foundation for its dual authority over both spiritual and secular matters. This forgery was routinely invoked throughout the High Middle Ages to justify the Pope’s secular rule, particularly in ongoing disputes with the Holy Roman Emperors, where it was used to assert papal primacy over rulers who claimed direct divine authority. Although it had limited immediate impact upon its compilation, it significantly influenced European political and religious affairs for centuries until it was conclusively demonstrated to be a fabrication by the scholar Lorenzo Valla in the 15th century. The Papacy’s reliance on this deliberate legal fiction to secure its political autonomy demonstrates a profound moral ambiguity inherent in its temporal phase. While the document helped entrench secular authority through legal necessity, it ultimately provided potent rhetorical ammunition for later critics, including the Protestant Reformers, who challenged the legitimacy of the entire papal structure based on this deceit.
C. The Pope as Secular Prince: Conflict and Contested Control
The establishment of the Papal States transformed the Pope into one of Italy's most influential secular rulers, obligating him to sign treaties with other sovereigns and actively engage in warfare. This dual role frequently put the Papacy's responsibilities into severe conflict. For example, Pope Julius II, famously dubbed the "Warrior Pope," fought on behalf of the Papal States, involving the territories in at least three wars during the first two decades of the 16th century.
In practical governance, the extent of papal control varied significantly. Although officially governing the territories, most of the Papal States were only nominally controlled by the Pope, with much of the territory ruled by minor princes whose loyalty was often contested. It was not until the 16th century that the Popes achieved any genuine control over the entirety of their mandated territories. The Papacy was therefore simultaneously a global spiritual authority and a fragmented Italian regional power, a demanding combination that frequently required prioritizing military defense and territorial administration over global spiritual duties.
D. Institutional Corruption and the Road to Reformation
The pursuit and maintenance of temporal power led to recurring periods of profound institutional instability and moral corruption. An early, egregious example of this chaos was the infamous Cadaver Synod in 897 AD, where Pope Stephen VI ordered the body of his predecessor, Pope Formosus, to be exhumed, dressed in pontifical robes, and subjected to a formal trial. Stephen VI accused the corpse of perjury and usurpation, officially annulling all of Formosus's acts before having three fingers cut off from the blessing hand and the body thrown into the Tiber River. This judicial farce reflected the boundless cruelty, internal chaos, and anarchy prevalent within the Curia during this period, severely discrediting the Papacy in the eyes of the European rulers and the faithful.
Later, during the Renaissance Papacy, Popes became obsessed with temporal concerns often at the expense of their spiritual duties. Figures like Pope Sixtus IV were known for their contributions to Italian politics and rampant nepotism. Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia) is often cited as the epitome of this era’s corruption. He was known for a lavish lifestyle, mistresses, numerous children, and blatant nepotism, granting land and positions to his relatives, and marrying off his daughter, Lucrezia, three times for the advancement of the powerful House of Borgia. The Borgia papacy underscored how the pursuit of dynastic and political goals displaced spiritual leadership.
The institutional failures of this era, including the selling of indulgences, compounded the pre-existing theological differences and calls for reform, ultimately culminating in the Protestant Reformation. The deep-seated political violence and dynastic corruption were clear symptoms of the Papacy's failure to regulate the power struggle over the Roman See, providing the essential external justification for the greatest schism in Western Christianity. The Papacy's ineffective response, notably by Popes Leo X and Adrian VI, who "failed utterly to grasp the seriousness" of the widespread support for figures like Martin Luther, allowed the schism to deepen.
Table 1: Key Milestones in the Papacy's Apostolic and Temporal Evolution (1st Century to 1929)
Date/Era
Event/Phase
Significance
1st Century
Apostolic Foundation
Saint Peter established as the first pope and Bishop of Rome (Apostolic Succession).
492–496 AD
Pope Gelasius I's Reign
First pope called "Vicar of Christ"; articulated the dual theory of spiritual and temporal power.
756 AD
Donation of Pippin
Formal establishment of the Papal States, granting the Pope secular rule over central Italy.
8th Century
Donation of Constantine
Forged document used to assert papal supremacy over emperors and justify temporal rule.
1870 AD
Capture of Rome
End of the Papal States; Italian unification finalized. Pope Pius IX declares himself a "prisoner."
1929 AD
Lateran Treaty
Resolution of the Roman Question; creation of the sovereign Vatican City State.
III. The Final Crisis of Temporal Power and the Roman Question (1870–1929)
A. Italian Unification and the Loss of Rome
The temporal sovereignty of the Papacy came to a definitive end during the final phase of Italian unification (Risorgimento). On September 20, 1870, Italian troops breached the city walls at Porta Pia and entered Rome. This military action led to the complete dissolution of the Papal States, which had endured since 756. The establishment of the new Kingdom of Italy in Turin was a direct challenge to papal authority.
This outcome represented the inevitable clash between modern European nationalism, which sought to define sovereignty based on shared language and territory, and the residual medieval structure of the Papacy's temporal authority. When forced back into a strictly spiritual and moral realm, the Papacy, although initially weakened, ultimately gained strength by shedding the extensive territorial and military liabilities that had necessitated centuries of corrupt temporal politics.
B. The Stalemate: Pius IX as "Prisoner of the Vatican"
Pope Pius IX staunchly refused to recognize the new Kingdom of Italy, viewing the annexation of papal territory as stripping the Church of its rightful possession. In response to the loss of Rome, he declared himself a “prisoner” of the Vatican, steadfastly refusing to set foot outside the Apostolic Palace again. In 1861, following the establishment of the Kingdom, Pius IX had already issued the allocution Jamdudum Cernimus to express his refusal to recognize the new Italian nation, denouncing what he called the “modern civilization” that sought to strip the Church of its assets.
This refusal initiated the prolonged political dispute known as the Roman Question. Pius IX's strategic withdrawal turned a military defeat into a powerful political and symbolic statement. By isolating himself and completely refusing reconciliation, he ensured that the question of papal sovereignty became a critical international dispute that the Italian government could not resolve unilaterally through domestic law.
C. The Rejection of the Law of Guarantees (1871)
The Italian government attempted to resolve the Roman Question domestically in 1871 by passing the Law of Guarantees. This law offered the Pope substantial concessions, including recognizing his person as sacred and inviolable, equating injury or insult to the Pope with that against the King, granting royal honors and the right to customary guards, and providing a significant annual indemnity of 3,225,000 lire to cover all the needs of the Holy See. The law also guaranteed the right to active and passive legation, ensuring the immunity of envoys accredited to the Holy See within Italian territory.
However, Pope Pius IX vehemently rejected the law, protesting it in a letter from his cardinal vicar in March 1871. The Popes refused this income and the entire settlement because the Law of Guarantees was enacted solely by the Italian government; consequently, it could be unilaterally revoked at any moment, thereby leaving the Popes without a secure, international claim to genuine sovereign status. The Papacy prioritized juridical international sovereignty over a generous but precarious domestic political concession, leveraging the Church's global moral standing to force a future resolution based on bilateral, internationally recognized agreement.
IV. The Birth of the Modern Micro-State: Vatican City (1929 to Present)
A. The Lateran Treaty and the Establishment of Sovereignty
The stalemate of the Roman Question finally concluded almost six decades later with the signing of the Lateran Treaty on February 11, 1929. This bilateral agreement was signed by the Holy See (represented by Pietro Gasparri) and the Kingdom of Italy (represented by Benito Mussolini). The treaty established Vatican City as an independent sovereign state under the complete and exclusive jurisdiction of the Holy See. The Vatican City State was geographically defined, accompanied by maps detailing its territory and buildings with extraterritorial privilege within Italy.
The Lateran Treaty consisted of three components: a political treaty recognizing sovereignty, a financial convention providing compensation for the loss of the Papal States in 1870, and a concordat defining the relationship between the Church and the Italian state. In return for sovereignty, the Vatican formally recognized the Kingdom of Italy and acknowledged Rome as the capital of the Italian State under the House of Savoy dynasty. The compensation was agreed upon as a definitive settlement of the Holy See's claims following the 1870 capture of Rome. The treaty was a pact of mutual necessity: Mussolini secured crucial Catholic support, bolstering his political stature against rising communism, while the Holy See achieved the guaranteed, non-revocable international sovereignty it had long demanded.
B. The Unique Political Structure and Dual Governance
The resultant political structure of the modern papal entity is unique in international law, necessitating a clear distinction between the Holy See and Vatican City State. Vatican City State is the physical, sovereign territory recognized under international law. The Holy See, conversely, is the central government of the Catholic Church and the non-territorial, spiritual entity which possesses the legal personality to enter into treaties and conduct diplomacy. The sovereignty of the Holy See is primarily exercised in the spiritual realm over 1.3 billion Catholic faithful worldwide.
Vatican City operates as an absolute elective monarchy, governed by the Holy See. The Pope, as the head of the Catholic Church, exercises principal legislative, executive, and judicial power over the State. Legislative authority for the State is delegated, in the Pope’s name, to the Pontifical Commission for Vatican City State, a body of cardinals appointed for five-year terms. The President of this commission exercises executive power. The distinction between the Holy See (the diplomatic actor with 179 diplomatic relations) and Vatican City State (the territorial base) is a crucial legal separation. It allows the Papacy to claim sovereign status under international law while maintaining its primary identity as a global, moral, non-geopolitical actor.
C. The 1984 Revision
While the Lateran Treaty was incorporated into the Constitution of Italy in 1948, its terms concerning the role of the Church in Italian society were significantly revised in 1984. The initial concordat had established Catholicism as the "only state religion" of Italy, mandating its inclusion in public school curricula.
The 1984 revision formally ended the status of Catholicism as the sole state religion of Italy, reflecting the increasing secularization of the Italian Republic. The revision also curtailed state involvement in internal Church affairs, ending state recognition of titles of nobility conferred by the Holy See, and removing the state's right to present political objections to the appointment of diocesan bishops. This revision formalized the Church's acceptance of modern secularism, marking a further deliberate step away from the temporal entanglements defined by the original 1929 Concordat while successfully preserving the core political sovereignty of the Vatican City State.
V. The Holy See in Global Geopolitics and Diplomacy
A. The Diplomatic Model: Moral Power and Non-Geopolitical Action
Holy See diplomacy possesses a unique structure and privileged, very long history at the international level. Its primary goal is explicitly ecclesiastical: to defend the interests of the Catholic Church, its rights, and its 1.3 billion followers worldwide. This model is not similar to that of other states, which base sovereignty on territory and population. Instead, the Holy See's diplomacy is characterized as that of a “moral power”.
The Holy See’s foreign policy acts in favor of moral understanding, promoting the idea that global peace necessitates peace and justice between human beings. The Holy See is prohibited from pursuing geopolitical purposes, focusing instead on the tireless search for peace and the rejection of war. This conscious decision to avoid geopolitical ambition allows the Holy See to maintain its exceptional diplomatic status as a perceived neutral arbiter, enabling its agents—nuncios—to engage parties in conflict where traditional states often face ideological or territorial barriers. This hybrid mode of agency relies on both religious and political modes, mediating difference between principals while representing the Church's interests.
B. Wartime Neutrality and Contested Morality: Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust
The role of the Holy See during World War II, specifically the actions of Pope Pius XII, remains one of the most significant moral and historical controversies in the 20th century. Pius XII insisted upon Vatican neutrality, a stance that has been criticized for preventing him from speaking out publicly against the Nazis and, specifically, the destruction of the Jews. Historian Susan Zuccotti explicitly argued that Pope Pius XII "did not speak out publicly against the destruction of the Jews," noting that evidence of a public protest would be easy to produce if it existed.
Pius XII’s avoidance of directly naming the Nazis became the foundation for contemporary and later criticisms. However, the defense of his actions points to pragmatic aid and diplomatic resistance. As Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (Pius XII) helped draft the 1937 encyclical Mit brennender Sorge, which critiqued Nazi ideology, condemning racial theories, and publicly restating the incompatibility of Christianity and antisemitism. After becoming Pope, he rejected antisemitism in his 1940 encyclical Summi Pontificatus. He also reportedly intervened diplomatically, protesting to Ribbentrop regarding the treatment of Jews and asking clergy to do what they could on behalf of interned Jews. Upon his death in 1958, Pius XII received emphatic praise from world leaders, including the Israeli Foreign Minister, who called him a "foe of tyranny". The policy crystallizes the difficulty of papal leadership during extreme conflict, questioning whether explicit condemnation or pragmatic, private intercession better serves the ultimate humanitarian outcome.
C. The Vatican’s Role in the Cold War and the Fall of the Soviet Bloc
Following the Second World War, the Holy See faced intense ideological disagreements with the Soviet Union, a government and ideology which fundamentally rejected religion. During the papacies of John XXIII and Paul VI, the Holy See attempted to enter into pragmatic dialogue with Soviet leaders. However, Pope John Paul II’s tenure dramatically altered the relationship between the Vatican and the Soviet Bloc.
Pope John Paul II’s diplomatic policies are widely recognized as one of the principal factors that contributed to the eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union. He consciously strove to make the Holy See socially significant without strictly politicizing it, maintaining a fine distinction that preserved the Church’s moral authority. His influence was won wholly due to his and the Church's spiritual authority. John Paul II successfully utilized the unique "moral power" status of the Holy See and his personal authority to mobilize populations behind the Iron Curtain, particularly in his native Poland. His actions demonstrated that cultural and moral leadership emanating from the Vatican could exert vast political influence and destabilize entrenched totalitarian geopolitical structures more effectively than traditional state diplomacy.
VI. Institutional Scandals and Reforms (20th and 21st Centuries)
A. The Clergy Sexual Abuse Crisis: Institutional Failure and Accountability
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the Catholic Church faced a catastrophic moral and institutional crisis concerning the sexual abuse of children by priests, nuns, and other members of religious life. This scandal involved allegations dating back to incidents that occurred between the 1960s and 1980s, primarily involving boys but also girls, some as young as three years old.
Investigations revealed a troubling, widespread pattern: thousands of priests were implicated, and Church authorities systematically engaged in cover-ups and the transfer of abusive clergy to new parishes, where the abuse frequently continued. This institutional response prioritized protecting the reputation and finances of the clerical culture over the safety and justice of the victims, resulting in multimillion-dollar settlements and significant financial strain on numerous dioceses. High-profile cases included the 2018 laicization of Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, found guilty of sexual crimes against minors and adults, making him the most senior church official in modern times to be dismissed for sexual misconduct. The systematic failure to hold abusers and those who covered for them accountable necessitated a global overhaul of accountability protocols and has profoundly damaged public trust in the institution.
### B. The Financial Accountability Crisis and IOR Reforms
The Vatican Bank, formally known as the Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), has historically been a nexus of financial scandal, including accusations of mismanagement, money laundering, and fraud. The institutional opacity of Vatican finances, a legacy intended to protect assets from external expropriation following the loss of the Papal States, inadvertently created an environment vulnerable to criminal activity in the modern banking world.
Recent examples of scandal include charges in 2018 against a former bank president for alleged embezzlement of €50 million through fraudulent schemes, and a senior cleric serving as a top Vatican accountant charged criminally for attempting to smuggle €20 million from Switzerland into Italy through the private bank.
In response to these issues, Pope Francis instituted a dramatic structural overhaul designed to ensure accountability and transparency, calling it unprecedented in its swiftness. The reforms established new oversight structures:
Secretariat for the Economy: Created in 2014, this new ministry, headed by a cardinal, holds broad authority over financial operations and reports directly to the Pope.
Council for the Economy: This body supervises financial operations and is notably composed of cardinals and, for the first time in church history, lay financial experts.
Office of the Auditor General: Established in 2014, this independent office audits the Vatican’s financial statements.
Asset Centralization: A significant rescript was issued in 2022 centralizing the Holy See's financial assets, requiring all Vatican departments to transfer their holdings to the IOR, thereby strengthening the bank's role as the exclusive manager.
The Vatican also now relies on external auditors, such as PricewaterhouseCoopers, to review its financial statements. Furthermore, the Vatican’s financial watchdog, the Supervisory and Financial Information Authority (ASIF), has reported progress, receiving fewer suspicious activity reports, an improvement attributed to a progressive refinement in its systems. The Holy See’s progress has received recognition from the Council of Europe’s anti-money laundering watchdog, Moneyval, suggesting increased confidence in the Vatican's financial systems. These reforms represent a necessary shift from clerical self-regulation to internationally verifiable transparency, crucial for maintaining diplomatic and moral credibility in the 21st century.
Table 2: Overview of Modern Vatican Financial Reforms (Pope Francis Era)
Entity/Mechanism
Establishment Date
Role and Structure
Impact on Transparency
Secretariat for the Economy
2014
Central government ministry for economic/financial policy and oversight, reports directly to the Pope.
Centralized control and standardized budgeting across the Holy See.
Council for the Economy
2014
Supervisory body comprised of cardinals and lay financial experts.
Introduces lay expertise and external, non-clerical supervision.
Office of the Auditor General
2014
Independent body for internal auditing of all Vatican entities and accounts.
Addresses historical lack of independent internal accountability.
Asset Centralization Policy
2022
Mandate requiring all Vatican departments to transfer assets for management by the IOR.
Strengthens the IOR's exclusive managerial role, reducing decentralized risk.
VII. Conclusions
The history of the Vatican and the Papacy is a continuous narrative of navigating the tension between spiritual claim and temporal necessity. The institution's foundation rests upon the enduring theological precedent of Petrine primacy, anchored physically to the historical burial site on Vatican Hill. The subsequent acquisition of the Papal States in 756 was a defensive political maneuver that led to centuries of temporal governance, characterized by conflicts, the use of historical legal fiction like the Donation of Constantine, and periods of profound internal corruption that directly fueled major schisms, such as the Reformation.
The modern Vatican City State, established in 1929 through the Lateran Treaty, represents a successful re-anchoring of the Papacy's sovereignty in a minimalist, internationally recognized territory, finally resolving the "Roman Question". This unique structure, distinguishing the governing Holy See (spiritual authority) from the Vatican City State (territorial base), allows the Papacy to function globally as a "moral power," consciously avoiding geopolitical entanglement to maximize its diplomatic reach.
Contemporary history demonstrates that the Papacy’s moral authority is its most potent instrument, as exemplified by Pope John Paul II’s pivotal role in the collapse of the Soviet Bloc. However, this authority has been severely tested by systemic institutional failures, notably the widespread clergy sexual abuse crisis and decades of financial scandals within the IOR. The comprehensive reforms implemented by Pope Francis, which emphasize transparency, lay involvement, and external auditing, represent a critical, necessary effort to align the Church's institutional conduct with its proclaimed spiritual mission, ensuring the continued viability and credibility of the Holy See in the international arena.
AI GENERATED (always verify)
Works cited
1. Pope - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope 2. Most Influential Popes | Peter, Leo, Gregory, John XXIII, John Paul II, & Others | Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Who-Were-the-Most-Influential-Popes 3. The Vatican: Photos Reveal What's Beneath St. Peter's - Life Magazine, https://www.life.com/history/life-at-the-vatican-unearthing-history-beneath-st-peters/ 4. Saint Peter's tomb - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Peter%27s_tomb 5. Papacy | Definition, History, Roman Catholicism, List of Popes, & Facts | Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/papacy 6. Roman question | history of Italy and Roman Catholicism - Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Roman-question 7. The Origin and Decline of the Papal States - ThoughtCo, https://www.thoughtco.com/the-papal-states-1789449 8. Donation of Constantine | Medieval Forgery & Papal Authority - Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Donation-of-Constantine 9. The forgery of the Donation of Constantine: A historical lie and its impact on Church authority, https://www.fabriziomusacchio.com/weekend_stories/told/2025/2025-01-23-forgery_of_the_donation_of_constanine/ 10. Papal States - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_States 11. The 7 Controversial Scandals of Former Popes - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fVEOn3xZIE 12. "Alexander VI: Renaissance Pope" by Jonathan P. Zorich - PDXScholar, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/5213/ 13. Pope Alexander VI | History, Biography & Corruption - Lesson - Study.com, https://study.com/academy/lesson/pope-alexander-vi-biography-corruption-quiz.html 14. Renaissance Papacy - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Papacy 15. The Roman Question: The Pope vs. the New Nation of Italy - TheCollector, https://www.thecollector.com/roman-question-pope-nation-italy/ 16. Law of Guarantees - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Guarantees 17. Law of Guarantees - Catholic Encyclopedia - New Advent, https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07048a.htm 18. Lateran Treaty | Research Starters - EBSCO, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/lateran-treaty 19. Lateran Treaty - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lateran_Treaty 20. The Secret Finances of the Vatican Economy - Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/030613/secret-finances-vatican-economy.asp 21. Politics of Vatican City - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Vatican_City 22. Holy See Diplomacy - CAIRN - Droit et Administration, https://droit.cairn.info/journal-pouvoirs-2017-3-page-47?lang=en 23. Vatican City - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_City 24. 'The Pope's own hand outstretched': Holy See diplomacy as a hybrid mode of diplomatic agency - PubMed Central, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6047204/ 25. Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XII_and_the_Holocaust 26. Holy See–Soviet Union relations - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_See%E2%80%93Soviet_Union_relations 27. Holy See Diplomacy: a study of non-alignment in the post-World War Two era, https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=798 28. Catholic Church sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_sexual_abuse_cases 29. Sexual Molestation Scandal Rocks the Catholic Church | Research Starters - EBSCO, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/sexual-molestation-scandal-rocks-catholic-church 30. Fiscal fallout at the Vatican - Harvard Gazette, https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/transformation-at-the-vatican/
